On the surface, it doesn't seem like there is much of any difference between "fanbases" and "audiences." After all, the both of them entail groups of people that are interested in one form of media over another, which is a point that cannot be argued against. With that said, though, there seems to be differences, if a recent article about YouTube is anything to go by. It might signal a shift in terms of how viewers are appealed to but will Internet marketing companies agree with such a point?
The Guardian posted an article about YouTube and how it is stressing the point of building "fanbases" - not audiences - to its many users. The reason that YouTube gave was that fanbases are more likely to choose what it is that they will watch, at the times that they would like. Audiences, though, seem to tune in to watch whenever they are told. It's easy to assume that fanbases have a more positive connotation, not just in the realm of social media but content creation as well.
As someone who frequents Tumblr, I have seen just about everything from commentary to live-blogging. This is especially true when it comes to television shows, as users will take to this particular website in order to write their own commentary, thereby creating content of their own. It's important to make note of this because, seeing as how this particular group stays engaged, the appeal of TV shows do not end once the credits roll. It's a level of engagement that Internet marketing companies can attest to.
I do have one concern that the article brought to my attention, however, and it was one that was focused on the gearing of content based on interests. It's important to keep in mind that the suggestion of certain videos can come across as intrusive, according to many Internet marketing companies. What has to be done is more organic engagement, which is an important factor associated with firms like fishbat. The content shouldn't be so much in-your-face; rather, the distribution of said content should be more natural.
The goal of this movement, by YouTube, should be to have the distribution of videos brought so that it has a far wider reach. With that said, I think that it is important to consider that not everyone is going to click on links in order to watch certain videos. Even though people might have similar interests, to say that they enjoy all of the same things is a stretch, to put it simply. With that said, I can only hope that this "fanbases" over "audiences" movement by YouTube can actually produce more engaging results.
The Guardian posted an article about YouTube and how it is stressing the point of building "fanbases" - not audiences - to its many users. The reason that YouTube gave was that fanbases are more likely to choose what it is that they will watch, at the times that they would like. Audiences, though, seem to tune in to watch whenever they are told. It's easy to assume that fanbases have a more positive connotation, not just in the realm of social media but content creation as well.
As someone who frequents Tumblr, I have seen just about everything from commentary to live-blogging. This is especially true when it comes to television shows, as users will take to this particular website in order to write their own commentary, thereby creating content of their own. It's important to make note of this because, seeing as how this particular group stays engaged, the appeal of TV shows do not end once the credits roll. It's a level of engagement that Internet marketing companies can attest to.
I do have one concern that the article brought to my attention, however, and it was one that was focused on the gearing of content based on interests. It's important to keep in mind that the suggestion of certain videos can come across as intrusive, according to many Internet marketing companies. What has to be done is more organic engagement, which is an important factor associated with firms like fishbat. The content shouldn't be so much in-your-face; rather, the distribution of said content should be more natural.
The goal of this movement, by YouTube, should be to have the distribution of videos brought so that it has a far wider reach. With that said, I think that it is important to consider that not everyone is going to click on links in order to watch certain videos. Even though people might have similar interests, to say that they enjoy all of the same things is a stretch, to put it simply. With that said, I can only hope that this "fanbases" over "audiences" movement by YouTube can actually produce more engaging results.
About the Author:
For more specifics about how Internet marketing companies can assist your business in the long run, contact fishbat today.
No comments:
Post a Comment